<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Checkpoint Secure Client 64bit Solution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.julian-young.com/2009/11/14/checkpoint-secure-client-64bit-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.julian-young.com/2009/11/14/checkpoint-secure-client-64bit-solution/</link>
	<description>Julian Young and his team provides bespoke development solutions, online marketing and search marketing solutions internationally</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:34:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkP</title>
		<link>http://www.julian-young.com/2009/11/14/checkpoint-secure-client-64bit-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 02:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julian-young.com/?p=216#comment-766</guid>
		<description>For crying out loud, Shrew Soft VPN (open source) works on Windows 7 64-bit.  I don&#039;t have a certificate for Checkpoint to import into Shrew Soft VPN (I&#039;m only a guest on a VPN), so I have to use this work around.  At least I only need to access internal web applications, but it still is a little inconvenient.

If an open source project can get it done, why can these commercial packages?  I had the same thing with Cisco VPN.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For crying out loud, Shrew Soft VPN (open source) works on Windows 7 64-bit.  I don&#8217;t have a certificate for Checkpoint to import into Shrew Soft VPN (I&#8217;m only a guest on a VPN), so I have to use this work around.  At least I only need to access internal web applications, but it still is a little inconvenient.</p>
<p>If an open source project can get it done, why can these commercial packages?  I had the same thing with Cisco VPN.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.julian-young.com/2009/11/14/checkpoint-secure-client-64bit-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 22:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julian-young.com/?p=216#comment-679</guid>
		<description>Awesome, you are a life saver! :) Thanks for this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, you are a life saver! :) Thanks for this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack Frankford</title>
		<link>http://www.julian-young.com/2009/11/14/checkpoint-secure-client-64bit-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack Frankford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 01:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julian-young.com/?p=216#comment-70</guid>
		<description>If your using an application to connect then you might not want to do that. Try this: Click start (Flag in the circle) and then click Connect To... and then click on the network and if you have a Network code enter it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your using an application to connect then you might not want to do that. Try this: Click start (Flag in the circle) and then click Connect To&#8230; and then click on the network and if you have a Network code enter it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 64bits. Um sonho ou um pesadelo? &#124; Marcolino Brasil São Paulo</title>
		<link>http://www.julian-young.com/2009/11/14/checkpoint-secure-client-64bit-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 64bits. Um sonho ou um pesadelo? &#124; Marcolino Brasil São Paulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julian-young.com/?p=216#comment-68</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.julian-young.com/2009/11/14/checkpoint-secure-client-64bit-solution/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.julian-young.com/2009/11/14/checkpoint-secure-client-64bit-solution/" rel="nofollow">http://www.julian-young.com/2009/11/14/checkpoint-secure-client-64bit-solution/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fabio</title>
		<link>http://www.julian-young.com/2009/11/14/checkpoint-secure-client-64bit-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>fabio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julian-young.com/?p=216#comment-67</guid>
		<description>But is possible that Checkpoint dont have a 64bit solution for net client?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But is possible that Checkpoint dont have a 64bit solution for net client?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Young</title>
		<link>http://www.julian-young.com/2009/11/14/checkpoint-secure-client-64bit-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julian-young.com/?p=216#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Hey Gustavo, you are correct, it is a workaround, I used a title that I had typed when I was looking for a solution/workaround. I know this isn&#039;t perfect for everyone but for home workers it&#039;s pretty handy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Gustavo, you are correct, it is a workaround, I used a title that I had typed when I was looking for a solution/workaround. I know this isn&#8217;t perfect for everyone but for home workers it&#8217;s pretty handy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo</title>
		<link>http://www.julian-young.com/2009/11/14/checkpoint-secure-client-64bit-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julian-young.com/?p=216#comment-50</guid>
		<description>This is still not a solution. It is a workaround. The major disadvantage is that i cannot synchronize outlook until i&#039;m in the office, and this is a big disadvantage of the solution.

For every other thing i&#039;m leaving with it for a year...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is still not a solution. It is a workaround. The major disadvantage is that i cannot synchronize outlook until i&#8217;m in the office, and this is a big disadvantage of the solution.</p>
<p>For every other thing i&#8217;m leaving with it for a year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

